Hi Mikael, I will change informational to no-purpose, not require IETF to publish it. what we do is just want to help people who would like to follow it.
I personally feel that this is maybe one of not easier part for western people to do in today IETF. and chinese's names sound maybe more diffcult than other eastern languages. Best regards, -Hui 2013/7/11 Mikael Abrahamsson <swm...@swm.pp.se> > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Zhongxin (Victor) wrote: > > BRAVO, techies not speaking Chinese would no longer mispronounce “Huawei” >> as the name of some U.S state. >> > > I have asked Huawei staff how it's pronounced and I think I get it fairly > right. People who hasn't, might get confused because when I use that > pronounciation it's not the prevelant pronounciation. About your example, > there are plenty of places in the US with french origins, and in US > english, these are pronounced differently than in french. What's correct? > Perhaps if Huawei would call itself Whow-wei in latin characters more > people would get it right, if this is a really sensitive issue. > > Linux has similar issue, Linus Torvalds native language is swedish, but > he's also a native finnish speaker: > > <http://danielmiessler.com/**blog/dont-ever-argue-again-** > about-the-pronunciation-of-**linux<http://danielmiessler.com/blog/dont-ever-argue-again-about-the-pronunciation-of-linux> > > > > How many english speakers pronounce Linux correctly? Linus' first name? In > what language? Do native chinese get it right? Is it really worth spending > time debating it? My name is pronounced differently in english and in > swedish, just like Linus' name is. I don't get upset when people get it > "wrong". Btw, it's pronounced Mii-ka-el in swedish (where the ii is a long > version of the initial sound in "industry"). > > So while I read with interest the documents presented in the original post > in this thread, I don't expect to understand and remember all of what's in > them. > > Are these documents intended to be published as informational RFCs (it > says "intended status: informational")? Are we intending to have one for > each 'major' language in the world? Where is the cutoff for 'major' status > of a language? > > Should the IETF really publish documents about human languages that > doesn't really have anything to do with Internet Engineering? > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se
