On Tue, 1 Apr 2025, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Sorry for being unclear. What I meant was that, given DKIM2, a DKIM1 verifier could be updated to handle DKIM2 signatures —if DKIM2 signatures were specified with compatibility in mind.
That makes no sense at all. Why would you waste time making a semi-broken DKIM verifier rather than just using a DKIM2 verifier? It's just a software library.
Regards, John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
