A or H and output of $D OUTCLASS(x) is the same for both on both systems.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
salva
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2025 1:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: JES weirdness

Please note the class (C column in SDSF) for both output: in the Hold queue
(H) and the write (O).
Then, repeat the $D OUTCLASS() for then.

i hope this helps.

El mar, 16 sept 2025 a las 18:10, Phil Smith III (<[email protected]>)
escribió:

> Quite possibly. I don't understand the difference. All I know is the 
> original statement: same job on 2.4 sends all to O queue, on 3.1 sends 
> some to each queue. And a lot of digging/reading hasn't illuminated 
> much, alas; I'm sure I'm looking in the wrong places.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On 
> Behalf Of salva
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2025 12:06 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: JES weirdness
>
> Phill, excuse my question, but are you confusing O/H (sdsf queues) 
> with O/H/X jes2 classes?
>
> El mar, 16 sept 2025, 17:57, salva <[email protected]> escribió:
>
> > Also check:
> >
> > Syslog for messages
> > Jes Policies
> > Autooperator/Netview actions
> >
> >
> >
> > El mar, 16 sept 2025, 17:06, Phil Smith III <[email protected]> escribió:
> >
> >> Well, I did the LONG and compared the output, generated differences.
> >>
> >> Class O
> >> 3.1 only:
> >> 3.1 JESCANCEL=ALLOWED
> >> 3.1 RESOURCE(JOE)=(LIMIT=DEFAULT,ACTION=DEFAULT)
> >> 3.1 RESOURCE(TG)=(LIMIT=DEFAULT,ACTION=DEFAULT)
> >>
> >> 2.4 MSGLEVEL=(0,1)
> >> 3.1 MSGLEVEL=(1,1)
> >> 2.4 OUTDISP=(,)
> >> 3.1 OUTDISP=(HOLD,HOLD)
> >> 2.4 SWA=BELOW
> >> 3.1 SWA=ABOVE
> >> 2.4 SYSSYM=DISALLOW
> >> 3.1 SYSSYM=ALLOW
> >> 2.4 TIME=(000030,00)
> >> 3.1 TIME=(001440,00)
> >>
> >> Class H
> >> 3.1 only:
> >> 3.1 JESCANCEL=ALLOWED
> >> 3.1 RESOURCE(JOE)=(LIMIT=DEFAULT,ACTION=DEFAULT)
> >> 3.1 RESOURCE(TG)=(LIMIT=DEFAULT,ACTION=DEFAULT)
> >>
> >> 3.1 BLP=NO
> >> 2.4 BLP=YES
> >> 2.4 JOURNAL=NO
> >> 3.1 JOURNAL=YES
> >> 2.4 OUTDISP=(,)
> >> 3.1 OUTDISP=(HOLD,HOLD)
> >> 3.1 SYSSYM=ALLOW
> >> 2.4 SYSSYM=DISALLOW
> >>
> >> I changed OUTDISP to (,) for both, verified that it took, then 
> >> reran my job--no change.
> >>
> >> Would any of the other differences cause this change in behavior?
> >> Doesn't look like it to me, but what do I know? Did I miss 
> >> something I should have $Ded?
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On 
> >> Behalf Of Chalk, Shelia
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2025 7:47 AM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: JES weirdness
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >> $T JOBCLASS(STC),OUTDISP=(WRITE,WRITE) - change  jes on the fly $T 
> >> JOBCLASS(STC),MSGCLASS=V  - change  jes on the fly
> >> $D JOBCLASS(STC),LONG   - display
> >>
> >> Then go change it in the parmlib.  Jobclass can be changed to
> >> outclass(A)
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Shelia Chalk
> >> Mainframe System Programmer
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On 
> >> Behalf Of salva
> >> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2025 11:29 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: [EXT] Re: JES weirdness
> >>
> >> Please Note: This email is from an [EXTERNAL] sender. Do not click 
> >> on links or attachments unless you expect them from the sender and 
> >> know the content is safe. Please contact the Service Desk if you 
> >> have any concerns regarding this message.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Try the LONG option: $D JOBCLAS(x),LONG Also, compare $D INTRDR
> >>
> >> I had a similar problem, but I do not remember the details.
> >>
> >> El mar, 16 sept 2025 a las 6:14, Brian Westerman (<
> >> [email protected]>) escribió:
> >>
> >> > I believe that he is trying to tell you that your settings for 
> >> > the MSGCLASS that you are using and the settings for the output 
> >> > DD class arE different on your two LPARs.
> >> >
> >> > Brian
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 23:44:30 -0400, Phil Smith III 
> >> > <[email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >Ok, and that means...? Sorry, you're clearly saying something 
> >> > >significant
> >> > but I can't grok!
> >> > >
> >> > >-----Original Message-----
> >> > >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> 
> >> > >On Behalf
> >> > Of Mike Schwab
> >> > >Sent: Monday, September 15, 2025 9:32 PM
> >> > >To: [email protected]
> >> > >Subject: Re: JES weirdness
> >> > >
> >> > >The MSGCLASS controls where the JOB log, JCL, and Allocation / 
> >> > >steps
> >> go.
> >> > >SYSOUT on DD statements control output for that DD.
> >> > >
> >> > >On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 5:21 PM Phil Smith III <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> From what I can tell, settings are the same on both systems.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> -----Original Message-----
> >> > >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> 
> >> > >> On Behalf Of salva
> >> > >> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2025 4:32 PM
> >> > >> To: [email protected]
> >> > >> Subject: Re: JES weirdness
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Output class parameters can be updated dinamically after 
> >> > >> JESPRM
> init.
> >> > >> Also, this changes may remain noted in Jes Checkpoint.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Try some commands and compare output:
> >> > >> $D Outclass(x)
> >> > >> $D Jobclass(x)
> >> > >> ...
> >> > >>
> >> > >> El lun, 15 sept 2025, 21:57, Phil Smith III <[email protected]>
> >> escribió:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > More 2.4 vs. 3.1 oddness: on 2.4 if I run a very basic COBOL 
> >> > >> > compile/link/run job, I get two SPOOL files in the O queue.
> >> > >> > One has the RUN output; the other has the JESMSGLG, JESJCL, 
> >> > >> > JESYSMSG, COMPILE, and LKED output.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > The same JCL run on 3.1 puts the JESMSGLG, JESJCL, and 
> >> > >> > JESYSMSG on the H queue and two files in the O queue: one 
> >> > >> > with the RUN output and the other with the COMPILE and LKED output.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > The only differences that I know of are the z/OS version and 
> >> > >> > the COBOL compiler version. The JES configuration on 3.1 
> >> > >> > matches 2.4, allegedly (I don't know enough to be sure).
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Any ideas? This isn't a huge deal but it's kinda 
> >> > >> > irritating--I just a lot of small jobs to verify stuff and 
> >> > >> > keep having to find the
> >> > "other"
> >> > >> > file(s) in the other queue.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >> > --
> >> > >> > ---
> >> > >> > ---
> >> > >> > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access 
> >> > >> > instructions, send email to [email protected] with 
> >> > >> > the
> >> > >> > message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> ---
> >> > >> --- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access 
> >> > >> instructions, send email to [email protected] with the
> >> > >> message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >> > >>
> >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> ---
> >> > >> --- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access 
> >> > >> instructions, send email to [email protected] with the
> >> > >> message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >--
> >> > >Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to 
> >> > >get away from it all?
> >> > >
> >> > >----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >--
> >> > >---
> >> > >- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access 
> >> > >instructions, send
> >> > email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >> > >
> >> > >----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >--
> >> > >---
> >> > >- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access 
> >> > >instructions, send email to [email protected] with the 
> >> > >message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >> >
> >> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > --
> >> > --- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access 
> >> > instructions, send email to [email protected] with the 
> >> > message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >> >
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> --
> >> - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
> >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO 
> >> IBM-MAIN ======================================= This email, and 
> >> any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended solely 
> >> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. 
> >> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager.
> >> This message contains confidential information and is intended only 
> >> for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you 
> >> should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please 
> >> notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this 
> >> message by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you 
> >> are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, 
> >> copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the 
> >> contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> --
> >> - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
> >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO 
> >> IBM-MAIN
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> --
> >> - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
> >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO 
> >> IBM-MAIN
> >>
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to