I believe that he is trying to tell you that your settings for the MSGCLASS that you are using and the settings for the output DD class arE different on your two LPARs.
Brian On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 23:44:30 -0400, Phil Smith III <[email protected]> wrote: >Ok, and that means...? Sorry, you're clearly saying something significant but >I can't grok! > >-----Original Message----- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of >Mike Schwab >Sent: Monday, September 15, 2025 9:32 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: JES weirdness > >The MSGCLASS controls where the JOB log, JCL, and Allocation / steps go. >SYSOUT on DD statements control output for that DD. > >On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 5:21 PM Phil Smith III <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From what I can tell, settings are the same on both systems. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On >> Behalf Of salva >> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2025 4:32 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: JES weirdness >> >> Output class parameters can be updated dinamically after JESPRM init. >> Also, this changes may remain noted in Jes Checkpoint. >> >> Try some commands and compare output: >> $D Outclass(x) >> $D Jobclass(x) >> ... >> >> El lun, 15 sept 2025, 21:57, Phil Smith III <[email protected]> escribió: >> >> > More 2.4 vs. 3.1 oddness: on 2.4 if I run a very basic COBOL >> > compile/link/run job, I get two SPOOL files in the O queue. One has >> > the RUN output; the other has the JESMSGLG, JESJCL, JESYSMSG, >> > COMPILE, and LKED output. >> > >> > The same JCL run on 3.1 puts the JESMSGLG, JESJCL, and JESYSMSG on >> > the H queue and two files in the O queue: one with the RUN output >> > and the other with the COMPILE and LKED output. >> > >> > The only differences that I know of are the z/OS version and the >> > COBOL compiler version. The JES configuration on 3.1 matches 2.4, >> > allegedly (I don't know enough to be sure). >> > >> > Any ideas? This isn't a huge deal but it's kinda irritating--I just >> > a lot of small jobs to verify stuff and keep having to find the "other" >> > file(s) in the other queue. >> > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO >> > IBM-MAIN >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send >> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send >> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> > > >-- >Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA >Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to >[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
