Try the LONG option: $D JOBCLAS(x),LONG
Also, compare $D INTRDR

I had a similar problem, but I do not remember the details.

El mar, 16 sept 2025 a las 6:14, Brian Westerman (<
[email protected]>) escribió:

> I believe that he is trying to tell you that your settings for the
> MSGCLASS that you are using and the settings for the output DD class arE
> different on your two LPARs.
>
> Brian
>
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 23:44:30 -0400, Phil Smith III <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >Ok, and that means...? Sorry, you're clearly saying something significant
> but I can't grok!
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf
> Of Mike Schwab
> >Sent: Monday, September 15, 2025 9:32 PM
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: Re: JES weirdness
> >
> >The MSGCLASS controls where the JOB log, JCL, and Allocation / steps go.
> >SYSOUT on DD statements control output for that DD.
> >
> >On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 5:21 PM Phil Smith III <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> From what I can tell, settings are the same on both systems.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On
> >> Behalf Of salva
> >> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2025 4:32 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: JES weirdness
> >>
> >> Output class parameters can be updated dinamically after JESPRM init.
> >> Also, this changes may remain noted in Jes Checkpoint.
> >>
> >> Try some commands and compare output:
> >> $D Outclass(x)
> >> $D Jobclass(x)
> >> ...
> >>
> >> El lun, 15 sept 2025, 21:57, Phil Smith III <[email protected]> escribió:
> >>
> >> > More 2.4 vs. 3.1 oddness: on 2.4 if I run a very basic COBOL
> >> > compile/link/run job, I get two SPOOL files in the O queue. One has
> >> > the RUN output; the other has the JESMSGLG, JESJCL, JESYSMSG,
> >> > COMPILE, and LKED output.
> >> >
> >> > The same JCL run on 3.1 puts the JESMSGLG, JESJCL, and JESYSMSG on
> >> > the H queue and two files in the O queue: one with the RUN output
> >> > and the other with the COMPILE and LKED output.
> >> >
> >> > The only differences that I know of are the z/OS version and the
> >> > COBOL compiler version. The JES configuration on 3.1 matches 2.4,
> >> > allegedly (I don't know enough to be sure).
> >> >
> >> > Any ideas? This isn't a huge deal but it's kinda irritating--I just
> >> > a lot of small jobs to verify stuff and keep having to find the
> "other"
> >> > file(s) in the other queue.
> >> >
> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO
> >> > IBM-MAIN
> >> >
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> >> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> >> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
> >Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to