>From what I can tell, settings are the same on both systems.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
salva
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2025 4:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: JES weirdness

Output class parameters can be updated dinamically after JESPRM init. Also, 
this changes may remain noted in Jes Checkpoint.

Try some commands and compare output:
$D Outclass(x)
$D Jobclass(x)
...

El lun, 15 sept 2025, 21:57, Phil Smith III <[email protected]> escribió:

> More 2.4 vs. 3.1 oddness: on 2.4 if I run a very basic COBOL 
> compile/link/run job, I get two SPOOL files in the O queue. One has 
> the RUN output; the other has the JESMSGLG, JESJCL, JESYSMSG, COMPILE, 
> and LKED output.
>
> The same JCL run on 3.1 puts the JESMSGLG, JESJCL, and JESYSMSG on the 
> H queue and two files in the O queue: one with the RUN output and the 
> other with the COMPILE and LKED output.
>
> The only differences that I know of are the z/OS version and the COBOL 
> compiler version. The JES configuration on 3.1 matches 2.4, allegedly 
> (I don't know enough to be sure).
>
> Any ideas? This isn't a huge deal but it's kinda irritating--I just a 
> lot of small jobs to verify stuff and keep having to find the "other" 
> file(s) in the other queue.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to