I agree with that.
On 5/30/2023 10:27 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I can’t speak for IBM but I believe that z/OSMF is part of the strategy to help
guide folks onto a consistent approach. The challenge is that policies,
procedures and configuration options have existed for years across thousands of
customers. The cloud refers to servers as cattle because they are deployed in
an automated fashion and are ephemeral and z/OS has been a pet that is long
lived and unique and are persistent.
Matt Hogstrom
m...@hogstrom.org <mailto:m...@hogstrom.org>
“It may be cognitive, but, it ain’t intuitive."
— Hogstrom
On May 30, 2023, at 1:19 PM, Tom Brennan <t...@tombrennansoftware.com> wrote:
Yes, z/OS is complex, but it doesn't have to be. Like Lionel implied, maybe we
need to standardize before something like z/OSMF can ever work as planned.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
