On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 9:04 AM Colin Paice <colinpai...@gmail.com> wrote: > > People feel that z/OSMF is not meeting their needs. Looking at the positive > side....If we wanted to get future z/OS newbies up to speed very quickly (1 > month) What should IBM and us users be doing? > > 1. Making better use of existing tools? Eclipse ? > 2. Simplify the installation process (perhaps download the CST level of > code including SMP/E libraries - so we users do not need to use SMP/E - > just copy the libraries?) > 3. Simplify the configuration? (How many configuration parameters are no > longer needed and could just be set to "default") > 4. Drive everything from off-platform through Curl? > 5. Setting up Racf definitions for a new product can be challenging ... > how can we simplify this - for example products should provide members of > the definitions. It is easier to delete unwanted lines - than type in > definitions. > 6. .... > > Is there anything easy we/IBM could do to move in the right direction? > > Colin > Examine the current system, create a script to set the equivalent values for z/OSMF?
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
