On Thu, 3 May 2012 22:03:03 -0500, W. Kevin Kelley <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>If the new MPFLSTxx option has it disabled by default or enables the verbose >>messages, what >>purpose does the OCE_ABEND_DESCRIP=YES serve in DEVSUPxx? > >The DEVSUPxx external has been deprecated and replaced by the MPFLSTxx >.MSGOPTION statement. > >>What if you want the original behavior? I ask, because I like it. > >So you'd like the option of being able to have verbose message lines >optionally go places other than JOBLOG? > Yes, the syslog / operlog. As I mentioned in my last post, I often go to the syslog even before looking at a joblog and I'm sure the operations staff (operators, production control, job scheduling, etc.) do the same. It's really them I am more concerned about. I've lived without the long messages for a long time now. :-) It could also confuse them if a user calls and describes a message they see in their joblog that isn't in the syslog. Depending on the job, the operations person may not even be able to view the output in SDSF due to security restrictions. Regards, Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:[email protected] Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
