Ok Viktor, I suggested the pattern because on other open-source projects I follow and participate, they use the pattern "xx-YY", but I will use the rules for Harbour project. I hope you guys understands that I not trying to impose anything. I'm just trying to help using my knowledge and experience from other spheres!
2010/2/20 Viktor Szakáts <harbour...@syenar.hu>: >> It's just a pattern, so we all know that always be "xx-YY" for ALL >> languages and not "xx" for that one and for the other, but for another >> it is "xx-YY", i guess! See! To avoid more things to think about! > > But this pattern is not true to the standard, > it can also be "xx", "xx-YYY", "xx-yyyyy-zzz", > see the RFC. Each have different and meaningful > meanings. > >> I've just made an admonition: "en-EN" does not exists. > > I know, that's why I started this discussion > in the first place :) > >> If we follow a pattern, it will be one less thing to be concerned about. :-) > > I think we should follow the standard, > rather than a limited pattern. > > If we invent our own pattern, it will not be possible > to interchange our language code with tools which > adhere to standards. > > BTW we should only worry about this _once_ for each > language we translate our documentation to. So > far we have bits in English and Spanish only, so > it's not very complicated. Moreover IMO we should > first concentrate on English only. > > Brgds, > Viktor > > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) > Harbour@harbour-project.org > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour > > -- Daniel Gonçalves Base4 Sistemas Ltda. [www.base4.com.br] [twitter.com/spanazzi] _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
