> It's just a pattern, so we all know that always be "xx-YY" for ALL > languages and not "xx" for that one and for the other, but for another > it is "xx-YY", i guess! See! To avoid more things to think about!
But this pattern is not true to the standard, it can also be "xx", "xx-YYY", "xx-yyyyy-zzz", see the RFC. Each have different and meaningful meanings. > I've just made an admonition: "en-EN" does not exists. I know, that's why I started this discussion in the first place :) > If we follow a pattern, it will be one less thing to be concerned about. :-) I think we should follow the standard, rather than a limited pattern. If we invent our own pattern, it will not be possible to interchange our language code with tools which adhere to standards. BTW we should only worry about this _once_ for each language we translate our documentation to. So far we have bits in English and Spanish only, so it's not very complicated. Moreover IMO we should first concentrate on English only. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
