Hi Viktor
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
>
> So IMO Harbour's place in this scenario is rather the
> server side, to help creating documents complying with
> above standards, server them through an IP stack and
> make them work in standard browsers.
>
>
You are right.
I see harbour as "a server side" platform.
Let me explain it.
1. I think that Harbour based Http server is superior solution to
Apache+some scripting
Harbour Http server + classic browser == Standard web app
2. Embeded Harbour Http server + Embeded browser == Standard desktop app
(User knows nothing about server and browser, easy switch beetwen desktop
and web app)
3. Qt bridge beetwen Webkit and APPI == Standard desktop app
4. 1+2+3 == lot of possibilities.
With little changes you can have Web app as well as desktop app.
With embeded web machine you have also multimedia platform.
Html4 was documment oriented.
Html5 is UI oriented.
It's maybe half-developed , but it's developing very quickly.
BRGS
Franček
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/SF.net-SVN%3A-harbour-project%3A-13834--trunk-harbour-tp27525434p27531157.html
Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
