Franček Prijatelj wrote:
>
> I don't understand, what is the reason for this decision.
> I am currently working with Qt 4.6.1 (both MSVC8, and official MINGW 4.0)
> with no problems.
> IMHO QtWebkit is one of the most important parts of Qt
> (and other toolkits to : WebkitGTK,wxWebkit).
> In the near future: "DESKTOP==BROWSER & GUI==BROWSER BASED.
> There is a lot off evidence: GNOME SHELL,CHROME OS,Qt (QML, SVG, CSS...)
> As I understood and as I hope , it was only a temporary decision .
> Today it's easier to develop desktop apps with Qt designer, GLADE or
> Delphi,
> but that is changing rapidly.
> The only problem is that there are to many possibilities
> (AJAX,XUL,SVG,HTML5) .
> Html is standard for documentation for many years now (CHM is html with
> some
> extensions).
>
> I hope that this decision will be reconsidered again.
>
The decision was based on two factors:
1. Qt with WebKit was not available on some distributions,
which ones, I do not remember, someone has to update this.
2. WebKit was too heavy. Appln consumed double the size of normal load.
But for sure QtWebKit will be a must for us.
Classes are ready and were implemented in hbXBP.
Only group decision is required. I do not know about *nix distros.
-----
enjoy hbIDEing...
Pritpal Bedi
_a_student_of_software_analysis_&_design_
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/SF-net-SVN-harbour-project-13834-trunk-harbour-tp4545547p4546441.html
Sent from the harbour-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
