> Pritpal Bedi wrote: >> >> >> The decision was based on two factors: >> >> 1. Qt with WebKit was not available on some distributions, >> which ones, I do not remember, someone has to update this. >> 2. WebKit was too heavy. Appln consumed double the size of normal load. >> >> But for sure QtWebKit will be a must for us. >> Classes are ready and were implemented in hbXBP. >> Only group decision is required. I do not know about *nix distros. >> >> > > It's available AFAIK on Win,Linux,Symbian. > Win32 /64 is available only on Win platforms, but it's hosted in > contrib\hbwin. > I see that you have everything ready. > Is there any problem to have something like HB_WITH_QT_WEBKIT and > build it only on supported platforms.
First we should discuss all concerns, if you care, pls answer them. BTW, it's supported on _some_ Linux distros. HB_WITH_QT_WEBKIT is no solution, but hack. Such setting should be resolved automatically. Or, it's still an option to move the whole QT related stuff from Harbour SVN to somewhere else and satisfy QT user special requests there. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
