Hi
vouchcac wrote: > > > As we have decided against QtWebkit, this implementation > may not look highly professional, will surely solve > our purpose. > > I don't understand, what is the reason for this decision. I am currently working with Qt 4.6.1 (both MSVC8, and official MINGW 4.0) with no problems. IMHO QtWebkit is one of the most important parts of Qt (and other toolkits to : WebkitGTK,wxWebkit). In the near future: "DESKTOP==BROWSER & GUI==BROWSER BASED. There is a lot off evidence: GNOME SHELL,CHROME OS,Qt (QML, SVG, CSS...) As I understood and as I hope , it was only a temporary decision . Today it's easier to develop desktop apps with Qt designer, GLADE or Delphi, but that is changing rapidly. The only problem is that there are to many possibilities (AJAX,XUL,SVG,HTML5) . Html is standard for documentation for many years now (CHM is html with some extensions). I hope that this decision will be reconsidered again. BRGS Franček -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/SF.net-SVN%3A-harbour-project%3A-13834--trunk-harbour-tp27525434p27526450.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
