No. It means that all the OLD M/S apps bring down the average.  (aka if you
care about uptime don't use M/S)

 

Premiere grants you support, AND if you have 300 apps instead of paying the
per app minimum fee you pay for usage so if you have 300 apps that would
cost $2 a month instead of the $10 a month minimum of ($3000) you pay the
$500 + $600 in usage fees.   See you save $1900.

 

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andrius A
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 4:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine's Team Dishonesty

 

Hi Greg,

 

can you please provide more information on you recent statement:

"The reason that the status site says the number that it does is because it
includes M/S and HRD apps so it is showing uptime for apps not under SLA."

Does that mean that premier accounts get better uptime?

 

Thank you,

Andrius

 

On 20 November 2011 22:10, Gregory D'alesandre <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Yoav,

 

I don't feel this thread hasn't been hijacked, but I'm not sure what your
question is at this point.  We typically do post an update when there is a
system-wide issue and we typically do a post-mortem as well.  So if you
question is "Can we post something when there are system-wide issues", the
answer is, yes, we typically do and we will continue to do so.  

 

It seems that the question is around the definition of "system-wide issue",
while you might've seen 3 issues that does not mean they were widespread
problem.  The status dashboard is run from a small set of probers and so
there are times it will show issues on the status dashboard when it was a
very isolated problem or worse it was merely an issue with the prober.
Should we fix this so that the status site is accurate?  As I said
previously, yes, we need a better way of doing this.  We have started
offering Premier Accounts (for $500/month) that provide operational support
so if you feel it is critical to your business to talk to someone when there
is an issue, you should sign up for a Premier Account.  The fee for the
premier account essentially pays for the people that you can contact about
issues (this is not a way for us to increase profits, its a way for us to
provide better service).

 

To be clear we are not going to post every single time there is any sort of
disruption to any application.  It isn't feasible to do so for a massive
multi-tenant distributed system running over 300,000 applications.  We will
continue to work on trying to find the appropriate level so that everyone
stays informed when there are issues.  But in the end there will be times
that you feel as if you have an issue, maybe slightly elevated latency, and
no one else is seeing a problem, this is what happens in large multi-tenant
distributed systems.  It sometimes is something you've done and sometimes
something going on with the serving infrastructure, if you want someone to
contact who will reply within a certain amount of time, get a Premier
Account.  That being said lots of App Engine team members monitor this list
constantly (well, when we're conscious) and you might sometimes get a reply.

 

The reason that the status site says the number that it does is because it
includes M/S and HRD apps so it is showing uptime for apps not under SLA.

 

Jeff is correct, whenever you assume we are insidiously trying to trick you,
its probably a better assumption that there is a bug, or a misconfiguration
or, even, very rarely, someone made a mistake, we are human.  Frankly,
anyone assuming that we are trying to lie in order to hide issues says more
about that person than it does about the App Engine team. 

 

Brandon is also correct in that you don't need to accuse us (or in this
case, me) of flawed morals in order to get attention.  There are plenty of
people we talk to all the time simply because they have a question.  If you
accuse me of lying to you I will most likely take a more defensive stance
than I would otherwise and ask for your evidence, again, I'm human.

 

Lastly, I sent a similar response about 24 hours ago, I thought I had
answered your question at that point, so I'm not sure if this answers it or
not.

 

TL;DR want someone to talk to when you are having issues, pay for a premier
account.

 

Greg

 

On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Yoav Amit <[email protected]> wrote:

Excellent! Can I now plllllllllllllllllllease get someone at Google to
comment on the transparency issue?

 

Is there any chance that next time GAE is at a very elevated status, as
seldom as that may occur, we the paying users can get a description of the
problem and a rough estimate of how long will it take to solve the problem
during real-time? Just something so small to hang on to and pass to our
frustratingly angry clients?

 

I am literally on my knees begging. I'll upload a pic of me begging if I can
get 10 +1's on this :)

 

 - Yoav.

 

On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:43 PM, WallyDD <[email protected]> wrote:

Could this be threatening behaviour? I'll let someone else decide.

Both of you. Knock. It. Off.



On Nov 20, 4:52 am, "Brandon Wirtz" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Calling the team dishonest.  Where I grew up calling someone a liar is the
> kind of thing that gets your nose bloodied.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
<mailto:google-appengine%[email protected]> .
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.





 

-- 
 - Yoav

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
<mailto:google-appengine%[email protected]> .
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
<mailto:google-appengine%[email protected]> .
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to