It would have been nice to see performance measurements from a more recent Go version. That said, it makes sense to me that Rust would be a better choice for this kind of application, where the main performance bottleneck is the sheer number of objects in memory. A language where you get to express more about the life-cycle of these objects should perform better. I say this as someone that knows very little about Rust, so I'm probably greatly oversimplifying.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 4:25 AM Everton Marques <everton.marq...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think Go is way better than Rust, but it is amusing to see why people > pick one over another. > > "Remarkably, we had only put very basic thought into optimization as the > Rust version was written. Even with just basic optimization, Rust was able > to outperform the hyper hand-tuned Go version. This is a huge testament to > how easy it is to write efficient programs with Rust compared to the deep > dive we had to do with Go." > > > https://blog.discordapp.com/why-discord-is-switching-from-go-to-rust-a190bbca2b1f > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/c3d9fc18-b750-48d7-b0b8-fd78afdbbf29%40googlegroups.com > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAA%3DXfu2wEHsC0fo32srrrJnXnLA2-s%2BzJ82JF7T96NqtQBkUVQ%40mail.gmail.com.
