> "Remarkably, we had only put very basic thought into optimization as the Rust > version was written. Even with just basic optimization, Rust was able to > outperform the hyper hand-tuned Go version. This is a huge testament to how > easy it is to write efficient programs with Rust compared to the deep dive we > had to do with Go."
This article does not tell use when the switch from Go to Rust was made. But it is interesting to see that they compare the ancient Go version 1.9 with bleeding endge Rust. I am no expert for GC in Go but I would strongly assume that since Go 1.9 much has been improved to handle situations like those described in the article. Lutz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/2051487124.89895.1581080343939%40webmail.strato.com.
