On 10/27/2016 02:29 PM, Jordan Krage wrote:
> At the very least, this kind of CoC 'enforcement' should be entirely
> public and transparent. How are others supposed to learn what is
> considered a violation, when violators are only contacted privately by
> email?
The point of a CoC is to police people's thoughts and suppress those
thoughts when those thoughts are disapproved of by people who act as
authorities for said CoC. So, if they do not like your ideas / programs
/ leanings, it doesn't matter whether you /actually/ are toxic, the
self-appointed enforcers will still accuse you of being toxic, and
banish you anyway.
This is how thought control is implemented nowadays.
It's high time people realized this. And high time good people started
pushing back.
--
Rudd-O
http://rudd-o.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
