Sure you willfully participate on a forum often used for insults, character assassination, witch hunts and doxxing. This isn't the first time shit like this happens on /r/golang , and frankly it gives the whole Go community a bad name. Keep being embarrassed "on my behalf", Who the hell do you think you are ? I didn't show you disrespect, don't insult me.
Le vendredi 28 octobre 2016 05:00:40 UTC+2, ad...@garyshood.com a écrit : > > The golang subreddit is infinitely more useful and accessible than most > golang resource sites and this mailing list. Shutting it down should not be > considered (notice how nobody is responding postively to your idea? (that's > how you know it is bad)). I'm embarrassed on your behalf that you even > suggested this. > > On Thursday, October 27, 2016 at 7:41:42 AM UTC-7, prade...@gmail.com > wrote: >> >> Frankly /r/golang is so toxic I stopped posting there, it should be >> either shut down or officially excluded from any official go forum. >> >> The code of conduct serves very little purpose >> given what happens there constantly, >> >> People like to target projects, insult their author and call them thieves >> to destroy their reputation and then complain and play the victim when they >> are being called out when caught misbehaving ? >> >> I say shut down /r/golang , there is very little moderation there to >> begin with. >> >> I'm sure Sarah Adams did the best she could to de-escalate the situation >> but frankly there is nothing that can really be done due to the nature of >> reddit. >> >> Le jeudi 27 octobre 2016 13:36:23 UTC+2, Aram Hăvărneanu a écrit : >>> >>> I have received a very insulting and distressing e-mail from Sarah >>> Adams, who claims to represent the The Go Code of Conduct Team, an >>> illicit bully organization who claims authority about what Go >>> contributors think and say outside the Go mailing lists. I do not >>> recognize this group's legitimacy in these matters. >>> >>> The e-mail says: >>> >>> We received a report about your comment on this thread >>> >>> https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/57w79c/why_you_really_should_stop_using_iris/d8wdynd >>> : >>> "Their English was so bad I couldn't understand what was >>> going on". >>> >>> This comment goes against our community Code of Conduct, >>> https://golang.org/conduct. The comment is not respectful, >>> and would have been more productive just as, "I couldn't >>> understand what was going on". >>> >>> Please consider this a warning from the Code of Conduct >>> working group. >>> >>> Some more context is necessary. There is someone in the Go community >>> who literally steals other people's code, receives money for it, >>> and actively tries to covers his tracks. >>> >>> A person named Florin Pățan provided an overview: >>> >>> [1] >>> http://www.florinpatan.ro/2016/10/why-you-should-not-use-iris-for-your-go.html >>> >>> which has been discussed on reddit: >>> >>> [2] >>> https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/57tmp1/why_you_should_not_use_iris_for_your_go_projects >>> . >>> >>> Reddit also discussed this thief's action in another thread: >>> >>> [3] >>> https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/57w79c/why_you_really_should_stop_using_iris/ >>> >>> I have archived these documents here: >>> >>> [1] http://archive.is/9oN1A >>> [2] http://archive.is/Q36G5 >>> [3] http://archive.is/aSFUg >>> >>> The comment in question refers to this GitHub issue, also archived: >>> >>> [4] https://github.com/avelino/awesome-go/pull/1137 >>> [4] http://archive.is/7xgc7 >>> >>> Now take a look at what I said, and what Sarah Adams in her >>> infinite arrogance suggests I should have said: >>> >>> Aram: Their English was so bad I couldn't understand what >>> was going on >>> >>> Sarah: I couldn't understand what was going on >>> >>> If you compare these two phrases: you can see that the problem Sarah >>> Adams has is with "their English was so bad". >>> >>> In other words, Sarah's problem is with speaking the objective >>> *TRUTH*. >>> >>> Whether someone speaks good or bad English is an objective fact >>> easily determined by anyone who speaks English at some level of >>> proficiency. I encourage all English speakers to take a look at [4] >>> and do an individual assessment of the level of proficiency in English >>> those sock puppets possess. >>> >>> I will not be policed around for telling the *TRUTH*. I will not >>> be silenced into political compliance. I will not tolerate other >>> people who tell me what is acceptable to say, especially when these >>> people only want to hide the *OBJECTIVE TRUTH*. >>> >>> The comment is not respectful >>> >>> Damn right it wasn't. You or your organization has no authority >>> mandating how respectful my speech is. What level of arrogance. >>> >>> However, it was not disrespectful. It was an objective assessment >>> of an *infractor's* level of English competence. >>> >>> I owe nobody respect. Certainly not someone who breaks the law and >>> steals other people's intellectual property. Respect is earned. >>> >>> and would have been more productive just as >>> >>> Ah, yes, here you can see in action the new-age practice of corporate >>> double speak applied to open source projects. This is not Google. >>> You are not fooling me or anyone else who still has a grain of >>> independent thought left. >>> >>> This is a pathetic and disgusting attempt of silencing independent >>> contributors who still refuse to kneel after your coup d'état in >>> which you managed to replace the Go technical governance with a >>> thought police political organization vassal to Google. >>> >>> In some sense, you have succeeded. I will never yield to you, you >>> can never silence me, but you certainly made me realise that my >>> association with the Go project is a mistake and a liability. I do >>> not want to be associated with your organization, even accidentally. >>> When I contribute to Go, I only make you people stronger. In fact, >>> this is your modus operandi; you rely on people who do the actual >>> technical work (either as part of the Go team, or as contributors) >>> in order to gain more support for your cause. To gain legitimacy. >>> To claim authority. >>> >>> I cannot remove the code I have contributed to the Go project over >>> the years, but I can certainly stop contributing as an individual >>> in the future. I will make sure, best of my ability, that any >>> competent individual or organization who is evaluating Go is made >>> aware of who is actually pulling the strings here, and what they >>> are getting into. >>> >>> Stalking people online for thought crimes! This is what the Go >>> project has succumbed to! And newcomers need to be aware of that. >>> >>> You are luring people with technical arguments and weed them with >>> political correctness. Your propaganda machine is strong, but not >>> infallible. Just like all good propaganda, you rely on a majority >>> of true facts to hide you agenda and falsehoods. Yes, your technical >>> preaching is truthful, and that is the best disguise for your dark >>> agenda of manipulation, control and deceit. >>> >>> But you are not fooling everyone, you are not fooling me. I will >>> not be controlled by a neo-puritan organization. >>> >>> If there's anyone left who still has the power and courage to say >>> no to these bullies, consider who you should prosecute: >>> >>> 1) a thief who makes money from stolen intellectual >>> property >>> 2) someone who realized the thief's command of the >>> English language is so poor, he cannot be understood. >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> PS: I suspect it's the thief himself who reported me to your >>> organization, and because your extrajudicial court works so well, >>> you have managed to sentence the wrong person. >>> >>> -- >>> Aram Hăvărneanu >>> Go contributor >>> Not a thief >>> Critical thinker >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
