| People feel humiliated when called out publicly. The terminology 'called out' is a mischaracterization of what I am suggesting.
| Imagine this happened in a workplace. Do you bring it up at the team meeting? Or take them aside and mention it to them in private? IMHO this is not an appropriate analogy. On Thursday, October 27, 2016 at 10:49:46 AM UTC-5, Andrew Gerrand wrote: > > > > On 28 October 2016 at 02:24, Jordan Krage <jma...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> Perhaps I was too broad in saying 'entirely public and transparent'. I >> did not mean to suggest that *reporters* should be made public. >> >> That being said, I don't agree that a moderator post pointing out >> violations is a form of shaming (if that is what you meant). Additionally, >> it communicates the point to everyone at once, rather than addressing >> individuals on a case by case basis. >> > > I have done this before, and it has not gone well. People feel humiliated > when called out publicly. > > Imagine this happened in a workplace. Do you bring it up at the team > meeting? Or take them aside and mention it to them in private? > > I think some discretion is a matter of courtesy and respect to all > involved. > > Andrew > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
