On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:00:38PM -0600, Kurt Fitzner wrote: > Ok, that other thread isn't about the GD, but this one is. I think this > is something that should be discussed and a consensus reached. > > Are they a good/bad signer? > Does something need to be done about them? > Should they be approached by the community? > > ... > > Signature cleaning and/or filtering is not the answer, just as spam > filtering is not the ultimate answer. The cost to the IT industry of > spam filtering is enormous. Let's deal with the problem at the source. > > Kurt. I think this is public more keyservers design problem than GD. Keyserver should accept new signatures only from key owner.
-- Pawel I. Shajdo _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
