On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 07:58:57PM -0600, Kurt Fitzner wrote: > > It might be useful to tone down the rage here. PGP isn't producing > > toxic waste. They're producing small packets of binary data. Nobody > > is actually being poisoned and dying here. Extra signatures on keys > > do not actually harm anyone, despite all the hysterics that they seem > > to cause. At best, this is an aesthetic problem. > > The keyservers are the individuals being poisoned. It's a heavy metal > poison. In general, heavy metal poisons are dangerous because they > accumulate in the tissues of the affected individual and aren't > naturally cleaned and purged. Also, like the poisoning of many heavy > metals, this onem, if left to accumulate, will cause brain dysfunction > in the infected individuals.
There are so many levels of wrong here that I am actually struck utterly silent. Congratulations. I'm leaving the thread. I cannot answer without somehow falsely implying that there is any signal in the noise. David _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
