Pawel Shajdo wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:00:38PM -0600, Kurt Fitzner wrote: > >>Ok, that other thread isn't about the GD, but this one is. I think this >>is something that should be discussed and a consensus reached. >> >>Are they a good/bad signer? >>Does something need to be done about them? >>Should they be approached by the community? >> >>... >> >>Signature cleaning and/or filtering is not the answer, just as spam >>filtering is not the ultimate answer. The cost to the IT industry of >>spam filtering is enormous. Let's deal with the problem at the source. >> >> Kurt. > > I think this is public more keyservers design problem than GD. Keyserver > should accept new signatures only from key owner. >
That poses a significant problem when someone loses their key, but has a trusted revoker set... there are other situations where someone other than the key's owner would want to upload the key, but I can't think of them at the moment. -- Alphax | /"\ Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \ _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
