David Shaw wrote:
>> Also, these are not "junk" signatures. They have semantic meaning, >> and are used by many people. Please clarify what makes a signature a >> "junk" signature. I'd like to understand why you classify them that >> way. Put it the other way round - what useful purpose do they serve? I haven't seen one yet, ergo they are junk. I don't even like the added signatures when a key is edited, unless it is that particular signature that is edited I would prefer to see the original signature date. Cleaning the key removes the older ones, instead of the junk ones. >> Why the outrage? I really don't understand why people are so hopping >> mad about this. Turn on "import-clean" in your gpg.conf and you'll >> never see more than one GD signature at a time. It may do with the nightly builds, but it doesn't yet work on the release version of GPG. Sadly, I doubt PGP corporation would take any notice of a petition - they don't even listen to and reply their paid subscribers comments, never mind those that don't use PGP. Regards, Bob
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
