github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Int64 as default type for make_array function empty or null case [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Int64 as default type for make_array function empty or null case [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Int64 as default type for make_array function empty or null case [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Int64 as default type for make_array function empty or null case [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Int64 as default type for make_array function empty or null case [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Int64 as default type for make_array function empty or null case [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Int64 as default type for make_array function empty or null case [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Int64 as default type for make_array function empty or null case [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Int64 as default type for make_array function empty or null case [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Cleanup useless/duplicated code in gen tools [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Minor: Cleanup useless/duplicated code in gen tools [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump clap from 4.5.30 to 4.5.31 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump clap from 4.5.30 to 4.5.31 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Regression: count(*) does not work unless using default expression planners [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Regression: count(*) does not work unless using default expression planners [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Regression: count(*) does not work unless using default expression planners [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Regression: count(*) does not work unless using default expression planners [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Regression: count(*) does not work unless using default expression planners [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Regression: count(*) does not work unless using default expression planners [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Regression: count(*) does not work unless using default expression planners [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add all missing table options to be handled in any order [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add all missing table options to be handled in any order [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add all missing table options to be handled in any order [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add all missing table options to be handled in any order [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add all missing table options to be handled in any order [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add all missing table options to be handled in any order [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add all missing table options to be handled in any order [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add all missing table options to be handled in any order [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add all missing table options to be handled in any order [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add all missing table options to be handled in any order [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add all missing table options to be handled in any order [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add all missing table options to be handled in any order [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump substrait from 0.53.2 to 0.54.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump substrait from 0.53.2 to 0.54.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump substrait from 0.53.2 to 0.54.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump substrait from 0.53.2 to 0.54.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump substrait from 0.53.2 to 0.54.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] ## Implement tree explain for `ArrowFileSink` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Implement tree explain for `ArrowFileSink` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Implement tree explain for `ArrowFileSink` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] docs: typo in docs of ClickHouse column option MATERIALIZED [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [I] docs: ColumnOption::ForeignKey docs have wrong SQL syntax [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Attach `Diagnostic` to "more than one column in subquery" error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Attach `Diagnostic` to "more than one column in subquery" error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Attach `Diagnostic` to "more than one column in subquery" error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Attach `Diagnostic` to "more than one column in subquery" error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Attach `Diagnostic` to "more than one column in subquery" error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Attach `Diagnostic` to "more than one column in subquery" error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Attach `Diagnostic` to "more than one column in subquery" error [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Bad performance on wide tables (1000+ columns) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Bad performance on wide tables (1000+ columns) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Bad performance on wide tables (1000+ columns) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat/improve ruff test coverage [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat/improve ruff test coverage [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat/improve ruff test coverage [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat/improve ruff test coverage [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat/improve ruff test coverage [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat/improve ruff test coverage [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [I] [DISCUSSION] physical-plan-common crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] physical-plan-common crate and Revert the datasource - physical-plan Dependency [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] physical-plan-common crate and Revert the datasource - physical-plan Dependency [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] physical-plan-common crate and Revert the datasource - physical-plan Dependency [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] physical-plan-common crate and Revert the datasource - physical-plan Dependency [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] physical-plan-common crate and Revert the datasource - physical-plan Dependency [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] physical-plan-common crate ~and Revert the datasource - physical-plan Dependency~ [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] physical-plan-common crate ~and Revert the datasource - physical-plan Dependency~ [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support SQL pipe operator [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Support some of pipe operators [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support some of pipe operators [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] enhance sql-using-python-udf example [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] enhance sql-using-python-udf example [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [I] CSV file path handling in substrait.py example [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] CSV file path handling in substrait.py example [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [I] TPC-H benchmark does not run q15 [datafusion-ray] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TPC-H benchmark does not run q15 [datafusion-ray] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TPC-H benchmark does not run q15 [datafusion-ray] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Perform hashing in CollectLeft HashJoin in parallel [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Datafusion binary size has been getting bigger [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Datafusion binary size has been getting bigger [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Datafusion binary size has been getting bigger [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Datafusion binary size has been getting bigger [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Datafusion binary size has been getting bigger [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Datafusion binary size has been getting bigger [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Datafusion binary size has been getting bigger [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Datafusion binary size has been getting bigger [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Datafusion binary size has been getting bigger [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Datafusion binary size has been getting bigger [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Stop running Rust tests in CI for all Java and Spark versions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: unwrap cast for comparing ints =/!= strings [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] #15108 issue: "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] #15108 issue: "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] #15108 issue: "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] #15108 issue: "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] #15108 issue: "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] #15108 issue: "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] #15108 issue: "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] #15108 issue: "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] #15108 issue: "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] #15108 issue: "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Add ruff check for missing futures import [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ruff check for missing futures import [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [I] "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] "Non Panic Task error" is not an internal error [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Simpler / easier to see expressions in tree explain mode [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Simpler / easier to see expressions in tree explain mode [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Simpler / easier to see expressions in `tree` explain mode [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Simpler / easier to see expressions in `tree` explain mode [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `datafusion-spark` crate [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support User-Defined Sorting [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Extension Types / User Defined Types [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] WIP: User defined sorting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: User defined sorting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: User defined sorting [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Config: Add support default sql varchar to view types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Config: Add support default sql varchar to view types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Config: Add support default sql varchar to view types [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages