github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [I] Incorrect cast of integer columns to utf8 when comparing with utf8 constant [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect cast of integer columns to utf8 when comparing with utf8 constant [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect cast of integer columns to utf8 when comparing with utf8 constant [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect cast of integer columns to utf8 when comparing with utf8 constant [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Flatten array in a single step instead of recursive [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Flatten array in a single step instead of recursive [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Flatten array in a single step instead of recursive [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Flatten array in a single step instead of recursive [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Flatten array in a single step instead of recursive [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Flatten array in a single step instead of recursive [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Add test coverage for wasm32 + parquet build [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add test coverage for wasm32 + parquet build [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add test coverage for wasm32 + parquet build [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] `datafusion-proto` crate feature `json` is broken [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `datafusion-proto` crate feature `json` is broken [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `datafusion-proto` crate feature `json` is broken [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `datafusion-proto` crate feature `json` is broken [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `datafusion-proto` crate feature `json` is broken [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `datafusion-proto` crate feature `json` is broken [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `datafusion-proto` crate feature `json` is broken [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Cannot compile datafusion without feature regex_expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cannot compile datafusion without feature regex_expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Better CI feature checks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Split out `datafusion-substrait` and `datafusion-proto` CI feature checks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Split out `datafusion-substrait` and `datafusion-proto` CI feature checks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Split out `datafusion-substrait` and `datafusion-proto` CI feature checks, increase coverage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Split out `datafusion-substrait` and `datafusion-proto` CI feature checks, increase coverage [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Improved CI test coverage for rust features [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improved CI test coverage for rust features [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improved CI test coverage for rust features [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improved CI test coverage for rust features [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improved CI test coverage for rust features [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improved CI test coverage for rust features [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Statistics: Migrate to Distribution from Precision (#14896) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Statistics: Migrate to Distribution from Precision (#14896) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: compound_field_access doesn't identifier qualifier. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: compound_field_access doesn't identifier qualifier. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: compound_field_access doesn't identifier qualifier. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: compound_field_access doesn't identifier qualifier. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: compound_field_access doesn't identifier qualifier. [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: topk functionality for aggregates should support utf8view [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: topk functionality for aggregates should support utf8view [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: topk functionality for aggregates should support utf8view [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: topk functionality for aggregates should support utf8view [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: topk functionality for aggregates should support utf8view [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: topk functionality for aggregates should support utf8view [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: topk functionality for aggregates should support utf8view [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: topk functionality for aggregates should support utf8view and largeutf8 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: topk functionality for aggregates should support utf8view and largeutf8 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: topk functionality for aggregates should support utf8view and largeutf8 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] The Comet compiled on the Ubuntu operating system cannot run on CentOS 7 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] The Comet compiled on the Ubuntu operating system cannot run on CentOS 7 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] The Comet compiled on the Ubuntu operating system cannot run on CentOS 7 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] The Comet compiled on the Ubuntu operating system cannot run on CentOS 7 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] The Comet compiled on the Ubuntu operating system cannot run on CentOS 7 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] The Comet compiled on the Ubuntu operating system cannot run on CentOS 7 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Substrait support for propagating TableScan.filters to Substrait ReadRel [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] [DISCUSS] Release DataFusion `46.0.1` Patcheset (March 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Release DataFusion `46.0.1` Patcheset (March 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Release DataFusion `46.0.1` Patcheset (March 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Release DataFusion `46.0.1` Patch or `46.1.0` minor release (March 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Release DataFusion `46.0.1` Patch or `46.1.0` minor release (March 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Release DataFusion `46.0.1` Patch or `46.1.0` minor release (March 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Release DataFusion `46.0.1` Patch or `46.1.0` minor release (March 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Release DataFusion `46.0.1` Patch or `46.1.0` minor release (March 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Release DataFusion `46.0.1` Patch or `46.1.0` minor release (March 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Release DataFusion `46.0.1` Patch or `46.1.0` minor release (March 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Release DataFusion `46.0.1` Patch or `46.1.0` minor release (March 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Release DataFusion `46.0.1` Patch or `46.1.0` minor release (March 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Release DataFusion `46.0.1` Patch or `46.1.0` minor release (March 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Release DataFusion `46.0.1` Patch or `46.1.0` minor release (March 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Release DataFusion `46.0.1` Patch or `46.1.0` minor release (March 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Release DataFusion `46.0.1` Patch or `46.1.0` minor release (March 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Release DataFusion `46.0.1` Patch or `46.1.0` minor release (March 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Release DataFusion `46.0.1` Patch or `46.1.0` minor release (March 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Substrait support for propagating TableScan.filters to Substrait ReadRel.filter [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Substrait support for propagating TableScan.filters to Substrait ReadRel.filter [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Substrait support for propagating TableScan.filters to Substrait ReadRel.filter [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] regression: DataFusion 46 wasm compile error with parquet [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] regression: DataFusion 46 wasm compile error with parquet [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] regression: DataFusion 46 wasm compile error with parquet [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Epic] Unify `AggregateFunction` Interface (remove built in list of `AggregateFunction` s), improve the system [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [Epic] Unify `AggregateFunction` Interface (remove built in list of `AggregateFunction` s), improve the system [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Implement array aggregate functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Implement array aggregate functions [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Do not print logical plans in `tree` explain format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Do not print logical plans in `tree` explain format [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: Remove num partitions from repartitioner [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Remove num partitions from repartitioner [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Remove num partitions from repartitioner [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Remove num partitions from repartitioner [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Remove num partitions from repartitioner [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix logo in rust API docs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix logo in rust API docs [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Release DataFusion `47.0.0` (April 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `47.0.0` (April 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `47.0.0` (April 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `47.0.0` (April 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `47.0.0` (April 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `47.0.0` (April 2025) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Saner handling of nulls inside arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Bump `env_logger` from `0.11.6` to `0.11.7` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump `env_logger` from `0.11.6` to `0.11.7` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump `env_logger` from `0.11.6` to `0.11.7` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: #1495 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: PartitionBuffers should not have their own MemoryConsumer [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: PartitionBuffers should not have their own MemoryConsumer [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] PartitionBuffers should not have their own MemoryConsumer [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] PartitionBuffers should not have their own MemoryConsumer [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump syn from 2.0.98 to 2.0.100 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump syn from 2.0.98 to 2.0.100 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Regression: TypeSignature::Coercible does not respect user-declared type coercions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Regression: TypeSignature::Coercible does not respect user-declared type coercions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Regression: TypeSignature::Coercible does not respect user-declared type coercions [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Minor: fix extend sqllogical consistent with main test [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Minor: fix extend sqllogical consistent with main test [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Minor: fix extend sqllogical consistent with main test [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Minor: fix extend sqllogical consistent with main test [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] shell script to collect Benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] shell script to collect Benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] shell script to collect Benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] shell script to collect Benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] shell script to collect Benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] shell script to collect Benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] shell script to collect Benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] `ScalarValue::to_array` panics when getting statistics for List<Struct> column [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Invalid schema for unions in ViewTable [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Invalid schema for unions in ViewTable [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Invalid schema for unions in ViewTable [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fixed PushDownFilter bug [15047] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fixed PushDownFilter bug [15047] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fixed PushDownFilter bug [15047] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fixed PushDownFilter bug [15047] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fixed PushDownFilter bug [15047] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fixed PushDownFilter bug [15047] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fixed PushDownFilter bug [15047] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fixed PushDownFilter bug [15047] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fixed PushDownFilter bug [15047] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fixed PushDownFilter bug [15047] [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] beautify default column names [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] beautify default column names [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] beautify default column names [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Rewrite `datafusion-sqlancer` in Rust [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Rewrite `datafusion-sqlancer` in Rust [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Rewrite `datafusion-sqlancer` in Rust [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Attach `Diagnostic` to more than one column errors in scalar_subquery and in_subquery [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Attach `Diagnostic` to more than one column errors in scalar_subquery and in_subquery [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Attach `Diagnostic` to more than one column errors in scalar_subquery and in_subquery [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Attach `Diagnostic` to more than one column errors in scalar_subquery and in_subquery [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Attach `Diagnostic` to more than one column errors in scalar_subquery and in_subquery [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Attach `Diagnostic` to more than one column errors in scalar_subquery and in_subquery [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Attach `Diagnostic` to more than one column errors in scalar_subquery and in_subquery [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Attach `Diagnostic` to more than one column errors in scalar_subquery and in_subquery [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Attach `Diagnostic` to more than one column errors in scalar_subquery and in_subquery [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Attach `Diagnostic` to more than one column errors in scalar_subquery and in_subquery [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Attach `Diagnostic` to more than one column errors in scalar_subquery and in_subquery [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Attach `Diagnostic` to more than one column errors in scalar_subquery and in_subquery [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Attach `Diagnostic` to more than one column errors in scalar_subquery and in_subquery [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Attach `Diagnostic` to more than one column errors in scalar_subquery and in_subquery [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Attach `Diagnostic` to more than one column errors in scalar_subquery and in_subquery [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Attach `Diagnostic` to more than one column errors in scalar_subquery and in_subquery [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Attach `Diagnostic` to more than one column errors in scalar_subquery and in_subquery [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Attach `Diagnostic` to more than one column errors in scalar_subquery and in_subquery [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages