alamb commented on code in PR #14821:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14821#discussion_r1973381337


##########
datafusion/physical-expr/src/equivalence/class.rs:
##########
@@ -216,6 +216,17 @@ pub fn const_exprs_contains(
         .any(|const_expr| const_expr.expr.eq(expr))
 }
 
+/// Checks whether `expr` is among in the uniform `const_exprs`.
+pub fn uniform_const_exprs_contains(
+    const_exprs: &[ConstExpr],
+    expr: &Arc<dyn PhysicalExpr>,
+) -> bool {
+    const_exprs.iter().any(|const_expr| {
+        const_expr.expr.eq(expr)
+            && const_expr.across_partitions() != 
AcrossPartitions::Heterogeneous

Review Comment:
   I would find this code more explicit it it checked for `== 
AcrossPartitions::Uniform` rather than `!= Heterogenious`



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to