github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] feat: Add experimental support for native Parquet writes [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Optimize the join operators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize the join operators [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Use logical null count in `case_when_with_expr` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use logical null count in `case_when_with_expr` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use logical null count in `case_when_with_expr` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add support for native Parquet writes [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: Add boolean tests to `bit_count` Spark function [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Add missing boolean tests to `bit_count` Spark function [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] Memory accounting model discussion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] Memory accounting model discussion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] Memory accounting model discussion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] Memory accounting model discussion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] Memory accounting model discussion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] Memory accounting model discussion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] Memory accounting model discussion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] Memory accounting model discussion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] Memory accounting model discussion [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Document SQL dialect guidance [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump actions/checkout from 5.0.0 to 6.0.0 [datafusion-sandbox] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump actions/checkout from 5.0.0 to 6.0.0 [datafusion-sandbox] via GitHub
• [I] Panic in NestedLoopJoin with Nullable FixedSizeBinary Arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Panic in NestedLoopJoin with Nullable FixedSizeBinary Arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Panic in NestedLoopJoin with Nullable FixedSizeBinary Arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Panic in NestedLoopJoin with Nullable FixedSizeBinary Arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Panic in NestedLoopJoin with Nullable FixedSizeBinary Arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Panic in NestedLoopJoin with Nullable FixedSizeBinary Arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Panic in NestedLoopJoin with Nullable FixedSizeBinary Arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Panic in NestedLoopJoin with Nullable FixedSizeBinary Arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `ScalarValue::to_array_of_size` Does Not Correctly Allocate a Values Buffer for `ScalarValue::FixedSizeBinary` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: deprecate data_type_and_nullable and simplify API usage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: deprecate data_type_and_nullable and simplify API usage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: deprecate data_type_and_nullable and simplify API usage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: deprecate data_type_and_nullable and simplify API usage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: deprecate data_type_and_nullable and simplify API usage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: deprecate data_type_and_nullable and simplify API usage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: deprecate data_type_and_nullable and simplify API usage [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Row group limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] [BUG] median value not correct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [BUG] median value not correct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [BUG] median value not correct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [BUG] median value not correct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [BUG] median value not correct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [BUG] median value not correct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [BUG] median value not correct [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Support Non-Literal Expressions in Substrait VirtualTable Values and Improve Round-Trip Robustness [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support Non-Literal Expressions in Substrait VirtualTable Values and Improve Round-Trip Robustness [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support Non-Literal Expressions in Substrait VirtualTable Values and Improve Round-Trip Robustness [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support Non-Literal Expressions in Substrait VirtualTable Values and Improve Round-Trip Robustness [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support Non-Literal Expressions in Substrait VirtualTable Values and Improve Round-Trip Robustness [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support Non-Literal Expressions in Substrait VirtualTable Values and Improve Round-Trip Robustness [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support Non-Literal Expressions in Substrait VirtualTable Values and Improve Round-Trip Robustness [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support Non-Literal Expressions in Substrait VirtualTable Values and Improve Round-Trip Robustness [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump actions/checkout from 5.0.1 to 6.0.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump actions/checkout from 5.0.1 to 6.0.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: enforce `clippy::needless_pass_by_value` to `datafusion-physical-plan` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: enforce `clippy::needless_pass_by_value` to `datafusion-physical-plan` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: enforce `clippy::needless_pass_by_value` to `datafusion-physical-plan` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Different result for different target partition size [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Different result for different target partition size [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Different result for different target partition size for clickbench Q32 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Different result for different target partition size for clickbench Q32 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Different result for different target partition size for clickbench Q32 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Different result for different target partition size for clickbench Q32 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Different result for different target partition size for clickbench Q32 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Different result for different target partition size for clickbench Q32 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: update datafusion to 51.0 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: update datafusion to 51.0 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: update datafusion to 51.0 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: update datafusion to 51.0 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: update datafusion to 51.0 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: update datafusion to 51.0 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: update datafusion to 51.0 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: update datafusion to 51.0 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] Consolidate dataframe examples (#18142) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consolidate dataframe examples (#18142) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consolidate dataframe examples (#18142) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consolidate dataframe examples (#18142) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consolidate dataframe examples (#18142) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consolidate dataframe examples (#18142) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consolidate dataframe examples (#18142) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consolidate dataframe examples (#18142) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consolidate dataframe examples (#18142) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consolidate dataframe examples (#18142) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Consolidate proto examples (#18142) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consolidate proto examples (#18142) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consolidate proto examples (#18142) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Support limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support limit pruning [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Add `return_empty_batch` flag to `LimitedBatchCoalescer` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add `return_empty_batch` flag to `LimitedBatchCoalescer` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add `return_empty_batch` flag to `LimitedBatchCoalescer` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add `return_empty_batch` flag to `LimitedBatchCoalescer` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Add `LimitedBatchCoalescer` to `HashJoinExec` + remove `HashJoi… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `LimitedBatchCoalescer` to `HashJoinExec` + remove `HashJoi… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `LimitedBatchCoalescer` to `HashJoinExec` + remove `HashJoi… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `LimitedBatchCoalescer` to `HashJoinExec` + remove `HashJoi… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `LimitedBatchCoalescer` to `HashJoinExec` + remove `HashJoi… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add `LimitedBatchCoalescer` to `HashJoinExec` + remove `HashJoi… [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(small): Support `<slt:ignore>` marker in `sqllogictest` for non-deterministic expected parts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(small): Support `<slt:ignore>` marker in `sqllogictest` for non-deterministic expected parts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(small): Support `<slt:ignore>` marker in `sqllogictest` for non-deterministic expected parts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(small): Support `<slt:ignore>` marker in `sqllogictest` for non-deterministic expected parts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(small): Support `<slt:ignore>` marker in `sqllogictest` for non-deterministic expected parts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(small): Support `<slt:ignore>` marker in `sqllogictest` for non-deterministic expected parts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(small): Support `<slt:ignore>` marker in `sqllogictest` for non-deterministic expected parts [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: Add 0.12.0 changelog [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Add 0.12.0 changelog [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Make filter pushdown API more precise for their purpose [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Make filter pushdown API more precise for their purpose [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Make filter pushdown API more precise for their purpose [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Make filter pushdown API more precise for their purpose [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Make filter pushdown API more precise for their purpose [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Make filter pushdown API more precise for their purpose [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Make filter pushdown API more precise for their purpose [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Make filter pushdown API more precise for their purpose [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Make filter pushdown API more precise for their purpose [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] POC for DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adds memory-bound DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adds memory-bound DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adds memory-bound DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adds memory-bound DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adds memory-bound DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adds memory-bound DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adds memory-bound DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adds memory-bound DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adds memory-bound DefaultListFilesCache [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] update rat check to exclude stability files [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: Add filtered pending PRs link to main page [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Add filtered pending PRs link to main page [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Add filtered pending PRs link to main page [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Add filtered pending PRs link to main page [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Add filtered pending PRs link to main page [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Potential Improved multiple column aggregation performance by using bitmasks rather than `Vec<bool>` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Potential Improved multiple column aggregation performance by using bitmasks rather than `Vec<bool>` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Potential Improved multiple column aggregation performance by using bitmasks rather than `Vec<bool>` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Potential Improved multiple column aggregation performance by using bitmasks rather than `Vec<bool>` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Reduce FFI wrappers when round tripping code [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce FFI wrappers when round tripping code [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce FFI wrappers when round tripping code [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce FFI wrappers when round tripping code [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce FFI wrappers when round tripping code [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce FFI wrappers when round tripping code [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce FFI wrappers when round tripping code [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages