Attention is currently required from: pespin.

Timur Davydov has posted comments on this change by Timur Davydov. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/42410?usp=email )

Change subject: transceiver: split control command handling from socket I/O
......................................................................


Patch Set 3:

(2 comments)

File Transceiver52M/Transceiver.cpp:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/42410/comment/c3610f30_6b28b2bd?usp=email
 :
PS3, Line 1026:       return -EINVAL;
> This logic change looks unrelated to this patch, please split into several 
> patches.
The logic is preserved here. The different return code is only used to 
distinguish this case from a normal `0` return value after the function was 
split. Previously this condition was handled in the same function, so there was 
no need to differentiate it.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/42410/comment/43f6339a_bbd15495?usp=email
 :
PS3, Line 1091:     return rc == -EINVAL ? 0 : rc; /* Ignore invalid values, 
but report other errors */
> This is a logic change, please split into separate patch.
The logic is preserved here. Previously, when the timeslot was out of range, 
the function returned 0. After splitting the function, ctrl_cmd_handle() 
returns -EINVAL for that case, and ctrl_sock_handle_rx() converts it back to 0 
to keep the original behavior.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/42410?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: osmo-trx
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I5413aa511e951522270c75635e89448395fc429e
Gerrit-Change-Number: 42410
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: Timur Davydov <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 11:34:32 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <[email protected]>

Reply via email to