On Mon, 16 May 2016 10:05:33 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2016 15:56:01 +0800 > Ian Delaney <idel...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > As long as this persists and is not intervened to polish and tidy up, > > g-devs will persist in making innocent, naive or incompetent blunders > > and run the gauntlet of being publicly scolded over errata. I can only > > express my view that this style of personal demeaning potentially > > results in embarrassment, public humiliation and drives community > > members away from participation. The ultimate negative influence. I > > would never entertain taking on eclass writing with the incumbent qa > > member delivering assessments under the title of 'code review' in the > > style he does. > > If you're writing the kind of code that results in you being subjected > to scathing criticism for breaking metadata generation for the entire > tree, then discouraging you from contributing can only be good for the > distribution... Everyone can and will make mistakes, this is normal. Only those who do nothing make no mistakes. I see no reason why developer should be discouraged from contributing for a single blunder. Of course, if blunder rate is too high, comrel should take an action; but this is not the case here.
Best regards, Andrew Savchenko
pgpfYLIkdBuJr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
