On 15/05/16 23:55, Duncan wrote: > Daniel Campbell posted on Sun, 15 May 2016 04:04:57 -0700 as excerpted: > >> If the dev in question hasn't done that before, then it's entirely >> possible they *thought* they tested, or tested it *before* making some >> other edit and absent-mindedly committed. > Again, legacy CVS thought pattern. In git, commit != push, and it's the > push that's critical. > > Commit all you want without testing. Just test (and fix if necessary) > before you push those commits up to the gentoo master repo. =:^) > > (Of course, rebasing to fold the broken commit and its fix into one > before pushing doesn't hurt, either.) > Surely it should be possible to fire some QA scripts on pre-commit on the central gentoo repos (ie. at the push target end)?! Or am I being a bit optimistic ..
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
