Daniel Campbell posted on Sun, 15 May 2016 04:04:57 -0700 as excerpted: > If the dev in question hasn't done that before, then it's entirely > possible they *thought* they tested, or tested it *before* making some > other edit and absent-mindedly committed.
Again, legacy CVS thought pattern. In git, commit != push, and it's the push that's critical. Commit all you want without testing. Just test (and fix if necessary) before you push those commits up to the gentoo master repo. =:^) (Of course, rebasing to fold the broken commit and its fix into one before pushing doesn't hurt, either.) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
