On Mon, 16 May 2016 15:56:01 +0800 Ian Delaney <idel...@gentoo.org> wrote: > As long as this persists and is not intervened to polish and tidy up, > g-devs will persist in making innocent, naive or incompetent blunders > and run the gauntlet of being publicly scolded over errata. I can only > express my view that this style of personal demeaning potentially > results in embarrassment, public humiliation and drives community > members away from participation. The ultimate negative influence. I > would never entertain taking on eclass writing with the incumbent qa > member delivering assessments under the title of 'code review' in the > style he does.
If you're writing the kind of code that results in you being subjected to scathing criticism for breaking metadata generation for the entire tree, then discouraging you from contributing can only be good for the distribution... -- Ciaran McCreesh
