On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 03:17:05PM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: > On 12/15/2012 02:33 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 13:58:43 -0500 > > "Walter Dnes" <waltd...@waltdnes.org> wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 07:07:09PM +0100, Micha?? G??rny wrote > >>> Waaait, what? Did something change lately or are you just repeating > >>> the same bullshit for months? > >> > >> Older systemd boots OK with a separate /usr and eudev. But somehow, > >> somewhere along the line, as part of the merge, the udev portion of the > >> systemd tarball requires initramfs. See news item... > >> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/engine?do=post_attachment;postatt_id=36326;list=gentoo > >> It was actually finally released 2012-03-16. If you disagree with that > >> news item, complain directly to its author. If you can boot a udev-181 > >> or higher system with a separate /usr, and no intrd/initramfs, I'm sure > >> a lot of people would be very interested in knowing how. > > > > This was a Gentoo decision, not an upstream one. > > If I recall, WilliamH stated at the time that he believed that upstream > would make avoiding it increasingly difficult. My impression was that he > felt coerced into making that change.
So systemd still works with a separate /usr and you're continuing to spread misinformation. Demonstrating such behaviour while complaining about the behaviour of upstream is IMO very ironic. -- Regards, Olav
