On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 03:33:03PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> The difference is that news only communicates what is "news."  Unless
> the manual contains a revision history it contains everything you
> already know, perhaps with a gem buried in there somewhere.
> 
> This is the same reason why when something is wrong with Chromium you
> are supposed to post a 5-line patch to the bug and not a 300MB tarball
> with the patch applied, though at least in that case modern tools
> actually make finding the change fairly easy.

Hmm, are the manuals versioned with a public interface (git clone
…/handbook.git)?  That would make finding new gems in the manual much
easier.

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to