-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 24/07/12 05:13 PM, Brian Harring wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:32:00PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote: >> >> I've often seen cases like these handled by keeping a referenced >> file where it's traditionally expected to be found, but leaving a >> comment in that file explaining that the content of that file had >> been moved to a new location, and the old location is >> deprecated. >> >> Would that work for a circumstance like this? > > Not really, no- it would mean the PM would have to parse/merge both > locations, rather than just looking for the file in one of two > spots. > > ~brian >
...if the file was empty except for comments saying where the new location is, there would be nothing to parse. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlAP99QACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAMYgD9GVy2oqiSjbPO0+doxmM0bpyB vR/sX4zgzcYCdXBW/5oBAJddUSALwz3aoWiL6T9SsADTDVrN7VFNyyRd9sXc6WAf =MmwG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
