2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org>: > On Monday 21 May 2012 19:01:04 Francesco Riosa wrote: >> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger: >> > On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote: >> >> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing. >> >> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then >> >> remove eutils from autotools. Now, a bunch of ebuilds are broken out >> >> of nowhere. I don't believe this issue was that urgent in order to >> >> justify the significant breakage of portage tree. >> > >> > you're assuming the breakage was intentional. i also wouldn't really >> > describe it as "significant", but that's just quibbling over an >> > insignificant aspect. >> >> It's intentional not to revert the change, it's significant because it >> involve a number of significant packages like icu, vim and boost, some >> of them already marked stable (from a fast grep from the one mentioned >> in the previous posts). > > you've identified the broke things. so fix them. > -mike
wanna give me commit access for few hours? I've already done mass changes to the tree when introducing virtual/mysql seem something doable the same way.
