On Monday 21 May 2012 19:01:04 Francesco Riosa wrote: > 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger: > > On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote: > >> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing. > >> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then > >> remove eutils from autotools. Now, a bunch of ebuilds are broken out > >> of nowhere. I don't believe this issue was that urgent in order to > >> justify the significant breakage of portage tree. > > > > you're assuming the breakage was intentional. i also wouldn't really > > describe it as "significant", but that's just quibbling over an > > insignificant aspect. > > It's intentional not to revert the change, it's significant because it > involve a number of significant packages like icu, vim and boost, some > of them already marked stable (from a fast grep from the one mentioned > in the previous posts).
you've identified the broke things. so fix them. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
