On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:02:05 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 00:02:37 -0600 > Ryan Hill <dirtye...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > I don't see how removing an inherit is breaking an eclass' API. > > The way eclasses are defined, the eclasses it inherits are itself part > of its API. You can think of it using the lousy OO analogy that gave > eclasses their name: the (public) superclasses of a class are part of > its API. Like I said, technically it is. And that's terrible. Let's ignore it. :D -- fonts, gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgets @ gentoo.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
