On Wed, 23 May 2012 23:09:14 -0700 Zac Medico <zmed...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 11:11 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > > On Mon, 21 May 2012 21:04:44 +0200 > > Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > >> Looks like ebuilds not inheriting eutils directly even using epatch are > >> a lot as I have seen running: > >> grep inherit $(grep -r epatch */*/*.ebuild| cut -d: -f1) | grep -v > >> eutils > >> > >> Maybe they should be checked and a repoman warning should be added when > >> an ebuild is using epatch without inheriting eutils directly, otherwise > >> this problem could reappear if some other eclass no longer inherit it in > >> the future :-/ > > > > Maybe we should make eutils inheritance implicit so all ebuilds get epatch > > and friends automatically. Is there really that much overhead? Or am I > > missing something obvious? > > Do you mean in EAPI 5? We're already planning to include epatch, as part > of the epatch_user thing. I did. That's awesome, thanks. -- fonts, gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgets @ gentoo.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
