Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh <at> googlemail.com> writes:

> 
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:50:26 +0000 (UTC)
> Mark Bateman <couldbe <at> soon.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:41:30 +0200
> > > Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus <at> gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > > Also we should allow the stuff as directory thingus (portage
> > > > already handles it right).
> > > 
> > > That's a seperate thing that needs EAPI control. You'll need to
> > > propose it for EAPI 4 if you want that.
> > 
> > Except this "stuff as directory" was pre-EAPI and thus the PMS should
> > have captured that as EAPI-1
> > Ergo PMS is wrong and needs to be updated to refect reality
> 
> PMS accurately reflects the Portage documentation and the commit
> message that introduced the feature -- it's purely for use
> in /etc/portage/, which is beyond the scope of PMS.
> 
> It is not the business of PMS to enforce undocumented features that
> Portage supports only by accident and that aren't used in the tree.
> 

PMS doesn't depict just what portage should do, just what ebuild's in the main
tree are to expect.
This is a good feature (intentional or not) of portage and is already finding
usage in overlays.

Sure for such a feature to make it into the main tree EAPI it, but as it stands
its fine





Reply via email to