Rémi Cardona wrote: > Le 18/08/2009 03:30, Steven J Long a écrit : > [snip] > > Steven, > > This thread was dead for more than 4 days. Yet you pick it up and you > try to pick a fight with Ciaran. > No I was answering the points he made, specifically he gave the fact that something's not used in the tree as a reason not to put it in PMS. The prior mail about an alternative perspective on the process was about his continual digs at portage and its developers. You're right that much of it was more relevant to -project, but when I post there it gets ignored: http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/msg_6c82019575749b628de20de060149782.xml http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/msg_28e2659029951f7edeab10b01cd21d53.xml > I for one am tired of your behavior on this list Fair enough. I'm tired of ciaran's, and I'm bemused that you didn't take the opportunity to contact me off-list to discuss this. I'm on IRC most of the time, as any of several Gentoo developers could have told you.
> and I will not hesitate > to contact UserRel to get you out of this list if you don't settle down > and start acting like an adult. > If you wish to raise a bug go ahead. As for being adult-like, you don't seem to have behaved so yourself, afaIc. No, some of us don't respond the very next minute, nor do we consider 4 days a long time. Perhaps for a student with far too much time on his hands, it might be. The main point I was talking about was the subversion of the GLEP process by the EAPI one. You might have missed it; next time try reading the whole mail. > Now step away from this thread. > Done. -- #friendly-coders -- We're friendly but we're not /that/ friendly ;-)
