Dne středa 12 Srpen 2009 19:58:05 Jeremy Olexa napsal(a): > I am suggesting that the new 10.0 profiles be marked as EAPI-2 > compliant. This involves setting the content of the 'eapi' file to "2" > and bumping up the required portage version. > > This seems like progress to me. Often, developers are complaining that > they can't use SLOT syntax in profiles (I know that is EAPI-1). Since, > the only time we can bump EAPI syntax in profiles is upon a new > directory creation, this seems like a good time to me. The new > profiles are still in flux until the official stages/cd's are > produced. > > Also, another good reason is: "why not?" I don't think any Gentoo user > can avoid EAPI-2 up til now anyway. > > Any comments? No comments means it will be decided off-list. > Timeframe: 1 week from now. > -Jeremy Agreed. This is great idea. Also we should allow the stuff as directory thingus (portage already handles it right). package.mask/koffice-2 package.mask/live-gnome ....
Tomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
