-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Peter Volkov wrote: > В Вск, 28/09/2008 в 20:24 +0200, Thomas Sachau пишет: >> I see many ebuild that still use "econf || die", also econf should die by >> itself. Are there any >> specific reasons for this? Some cases where econf does not die also it >> fails? Or some other reason >> for this? > > This || die is redundant. Personally I remove it in every package I > touch and I suggest others do the same. People use our tree to learn how > to write ebuilds, so it's good idea to have consistent syntax in our > ebuilds... >
I suppose it depends on your notion of consistent. Does having econf behave differently from every other function seem consistent to you? :) - -- Thanks, Zac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkjiAckACgkQ/ejvha5XGaOAJgCeJKoJvmR2jxQvHZpaa6FplJ7c fgYAn25YS4vGXahxC1QA3QmJR7yC3D/W =da+4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
