Thomas Sachau wrote:
> I see many ebuild that still use "econf || die", also econf should die by 
> itself. Are there any
> specific reasons for this? Some cases where econf does not die also it fails? 
> Or some other reason
> for this?

My guess is that due to the general lack of consistency in what dies and
what not, people either make mistakes or just take the safe route?

Caster


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to