В Вск, 28/09/2008 в 20:24 +0200, Thomas Sachau пишет:
> I see many ebuild that still use "econf || die", also econf should die by 
> itself. Are there any
> specific reasons for this? Some cases where econf does not die also it fails? 
> Or some other reason
> for this?

This || die is redundant. Personally I remove it in every package I
touch and I suggest others do the same. People use our tree to learn how
to write ebuilds, so it's good idea to have consistent syntax in our
ebuilds...

-- 
Peter.


Reply via email to