Tres Melton wrote: > On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 22:47 +0000, Kurt Lieber wrote: > >>OK, fine. Devrel does not have an established track record of retiring >>devs who are otherwise inactive. Please fix this. Please also get an >>agreement from them that they're going to be willing to take on the >>additional load of these arch testers. Then please articulate the process >>that will be followed to ensure they're actively tracked and retired >>if/when they fall off the map. > > > I don't know about retiring devs but the AT's should fall under the > jurisdiction of the Head/lead/strategic lead/whatever the dude in charge > of the AT's for a platform calls themselves. For amd64 that is hparker, > dang, blubb, and maybe another one or two developers.
I see this as something that devrel would take care of since they already do this for developers. They already have the tools/access to the places for such things. Would rather not have another set of folks with that access. -- Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
