On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 22:56 +0000, Kurt Lieber wrote: > So, can other arch testers please pitch in with their $.02? If we gave you > rsync instead of CVS, would that be sufficient? Or do you need the > revision history, etc. of CVS? > > And, any objections to a ~30 minute delay between CVS<->this solution? > > --kurt
I personally do not need Revision histories, I can't speak for other ATs. Rsync with 30min delay is a noted improvement over the standard rsync policy. Does this also allow us to sync to main rotation mirroes is that already overstressed? I ask because IIRC it may take ~30min for all the mirrors to sync up to the 'Latest' revision, therefore the sync that I do _may_ be up to 60min old (worstcase). so main rotation mirror access would be nice. Feasable? I know not. Later Days -- Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org Gentoo x86 Arch Tester | ::0 Alberta, Canada Public Key: 0D46BB6E @ subkeys.pgp.net | Encrypted Mail Prefered Key fingerprint = 0CA3 E40D F897 7709 3628 C5D4 7D94 483E 0D46 BB6E
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
