On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 22:25 -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote: > Kurt Lieber wrote: [Sat Nov 19 2005, 04:42:41PM CST] > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:06:15PM +0000 or thereabouts, Kurt Lieber wrote: > > If the requirement is for r/o CVS access to the same CVS server that the > > pure-blooded developers use (sorry, couldn't resist) then it may require > > upgrades to our existing server and/or purchasing a new server. > > What about authenticated viewcvs on the live CVS server instead? Back > when we had a live viewcvs I used to use it all the time for doing > exactly what the ATs want to do now, and I assume that viewcvs puts much > less load on the server than a CVS pull does. > > In any event, do we need a new server anyway? We actually do have some > money that could be spent on such things, and the CVS server is really > high on the list of for which I, personally, would be more than willing > to spend it. > > -g2boojum-
If we were able to purchase hardware then we might as well make it the anon cvs/svn server, no keys/auth are needed then and simple aliases would suffice on toucan maintained by the AT leads. -- Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
