Lares Moreau wrote: > On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 18:13 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: > >>is the 25-55 minute lag good enough?
> It may need to be good enough. Personally I would like to have < 5-7 > min. That way when I'm working with a dev, I can keep up to speed with > her/him without having to resort to an overlay and emailing > ebuilds.tar's. A dedicated 'AT/HT' sync box sounds like an acceptable > solution. For now, I don't want to rsync more than every 30 minutes (concerns of overloading the main cvs server). Pylon has mentioned that the newer version of cvs has better commit hooks that may allow for more of a live replication effect, but I don't expect that to happen any time soon. I will try and come up with a revised version of GLEP 41 and see if hparker and folks will agree with this new solution. We will probably still have the blocking script on this server, but will be at a much higher level. This is just to prevent folks from abusing the service or giving out their access for other people to use. I really don't see that happening, but I would prefer to have some kind of prevention in place for infra's sake. I'll have to think out details on the authentication scheme for access, but I would assume it would be per AT and not a shared access account. Thoughts? -- Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
